Two people can sit in the same office, do the same work and report to the same boss, yet still have entirely different views of their job. One might feel trapped in a toxic workplace while the other feels energised by it. The difference? Itโs not to do with their work, itโs what they believe about it.
Youโve no doubt built mental images up of everyone that you work with. One person might be lazy, the other super smart, and thereโs always a colleague that we tend to put in the โdifficultโ basket. We spend so much time thinking about how to change other peopleโs behaviour, but what if the solution to improving our workplaces started with challenging our own invisible thinking?
Thatโs what Nir Eyal, the author of the new book Beyond Belief says. I spoke with Nir this week as his book hit The New York Times bestseller list, the third of his to do so after Hooked and Indistractable.
โWe do not see people as they are, we see them as we believe them to be,โ he says. โWe see our beliefs about them because the brain doesnโt see reality, it sees what it predicts about reality.โ
Some of the research behind this is what psychologists call the โfundamental attribution errorโ. This is our tendency to assume that other peopleโs flaws come from their personality, whereas our own mistakes are caused by the situation that weโre in.
It was coined by psychologist Lee Ross in the 1970s, and explains why when a colleague misses a deadline, we blame their personality (โtheyโre lazy!โ), but when we do it, we blame the surrounding circumstances (โIโm busy!โ).
If you can shift some of those beliefs, you might just find your job may suddenly feel a little bit more energising than it did before.
There are three ways we perceive the world, through facts, faiths and beliefs. Facts are objective truths, like the fact that water freezes at zero degrees, or the speed at which light travels. At the other end is faith, a conviction that doesnโt require any proof, yet can still be inspiring.
Between the two of these are beliefs, with Nir says should be viewed as tools not truths. โThe brain is incapable of seeing reality accurately, so it sees it through this tiny keyhole of attention.โ
Take your co-worker, the one youโve dismissed because every little thing they do helps prove your point that theyโre not adding much to the workplace. What would happen if you believed something different?
โYou could try on, for size, the belief that this person is not lazy, they just havenโt been given the right job to flourish,โ suggested Nir.
The aim is not to deceive, or even gaslight, yourself. Nir says there are four questions you can ask yourself if you want to expand some of the existing beliefs that we hold: โIs it true?โ, โis it absolutely true?โ, โwho am I when I hold on to this belief?โ and โwho would I be without this belief?โ Get to the bottom of those with honesty, and youโll learn that you can hold multiple beliefs at the same time, both limiting and liberating.
Of course, none of this means excusing bad behaviour or pretending that problems donโt exist. What it does mean is realising that you have a lot more control over the world around you than you think.
And if you can shift some of those beliefs, even just slightly, you might just find that the same office, the same boss and the same job can suddenly feel a little bit more energising than they did before.
Tim Duggan is author of Work Backwards: The Revolutionary Method to Work Smarter and Live Better. He writes a regular newsletter at timduggan.substack.com
Get workplace news, advice and perspectives to help make your job work for you. Sign up for our weekly Thank God itโs Monday newsletter.