The bench also cautioned those who had raised objections, saying respect must be shown to every member of the community, irrespective of religion, caste or creed.
“There has to be a secular spirit, and the Constitution expects citizens to foster the same,” it said.
A city like Mumbai depended on togetherness and a strong sense of belonging, the court observed, adding that such social bonds should not be disturbed by “loose comments”.
“We are a secular country. We are really hurt by this. The issue pertains to the environment and every person, irrespective of their religion and caste, is breathing the same air,” the bench said.
It added that people holding public office were expected to act with greater responsibility.
The court also clarified that its directions on firecrackers were not specific to Diwali. It had prohibited the bursting of firecrackers on public roads and streets throughout the year, citing the need to control air and noise pollution.
“Firecrackers are burst at all times like during marriages, processions, election victories and after cricket matches. Our order concerns all 365 days. The paramount consideration is the environment and control of air and noise pollution,” the bench said.
It said the restrictions were intended to protect the environment and applied irrespective of the occasion.
“Any human being can come and canvass about the environment, and there is no scope for any individualism,” the court said, emphasising the importance of community spirit and goodwill.
“What happened yesterday is the most unfortunate, to say the least. We are deeply pained by what has happened. Such a knee-jerk reaction was unwarranted. The message spread in the video was for the good of all persons irrespective of their religion and caste,” it added.
About the Author
