Religious censure has placed the AAP in an extraordinarily difficult position a few months before Punjab heads to Assembly polls. While the Akal Takht possesses no constitutional authority to remove an elected CM, its moral and religious influence among Sikh voters is unquestionable.
By branding Mann as ‘anti-Guru’, the Sikh clergy has effectively handed the Opposition a powerful emotional issue. Even if legal and electoral norms prevent political parties from directly weaponising the hukamnama in campaign material, the social and psychological impact of such a decree cannot be ignored.
The Akal Takht’s directive asking Sikhs to “shun ties” with Mann has further complicated matters.
Veteran observer of Punjab politics Jasbir Singh Patti argues that it creates unprecedented administrative and social dilemmas for Sikh bureaucrats and officers. “How can they shun ties with their boss?” he asks.
To add to this, the Akal Takht criticised the state’s Jagat Jot Sri Guru Granth Sahib Satkar (Amendment) Act, 2026, alleging that it was enacted without adequate consultation. All Sikh ministers in the Punjab cabinet, except Mann, along with Sikh MLAs across party lines, have been summoned before the Akal Takht on 29 June. Explanations have also been sought from non-Sikh ministers.
This puts the party in a bind. With elections approaching, many legislators are walking the tightrope between party loyalty and public expectations. In Punjab’s political culture, defiance of religious authority carries risks that elected representatives dare not underestimate.
About the Author
